INSIGHT

SPAC Transactions and SOX Compliance: A Strategic Overview 

Paul Bansal, Will Tanem • February 20, 2026

Services: SPAC Readiness, SOX Compliance

---

When a company chooses to go public through a Special Purpose Acquisition Company (SPAC), the timeline is often much faster than a traditional IPO. That speed can bring unique challenges — especially around compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX). SOX is a U.S. federal law designed to ensure transparency, accuracy, and reliability in financial reporting, thereby protecting investors. For companies merging with a SPAC, meeting SOX requirements can be crucial. 

Why SOX Matters in a SPAC Transaction 

Companies entering public markets must quickly adapt to stringent regulatory standards. SOX compliance is central to this transition because it governs internal controls, financial reporting integrity, and executive accountability. Among its most critical provisions are Section 302 and Section 404, which includes three key subsections: 

Section 302	The CEOs and CFOs must personally certify the accuracy of quarterly and annual financial reports. They confirm that the statements are free from material misstatements, fairly present the company’s financial position, and that effective internal controls are in place. This certification, backed by legal accountability, strengthens investor confidence, and ensures transparency in corporate reporting.
Section 404(a)	It requires company management to establish, maintain, and annually evaluate the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR). This involves documenting control processes, testing their effectiveness, and disclosing the outcomes including any material weaknesses in the company’s Form 10 K. It’s a self-assessment designed to ensure transparency and accuracy in financial statements.
Section 404(b)	Building on 404(a), Section 404(b) mandates that an independent, registered public accounting firm must attest to and report on the accuracy of management’s ICFR assessment. This involves conducting an integrated audit and issuing an opinion on internal control effectiveness in the 10 K audit report. The requirement applies to public companies above certain size thresholds and adds a layer of external validation to strengthen investor confidence.

Section 404(b) Requirements: 

Section 404(b) requires independent auditor attestation of ICFR for accelerated and large accelerated filers. Here’s a quick comparison of the requirement for a traditional vs a SPAC IPO: 

• Traditional IPO – Required for accelerated/large accelerated filers; EGCs may delay for up to 5 years 
• SPAC (de-SPAC) – Required based on filer status soon after SPAC IPO; compressed timeline 

A SPAC deals compress the timeline for meeting these obligations compared to traditional IPOs, leaving little room for phased implementation. 

SOX Compliance for Traditional IPOs 

For companies pursuing a traditional IPO, SOX Section 404(a) requires management to assess and report on the effectiveness of ICFR. Importantly, newly public companies receive a grace period – typically companies have until their second annual Form 10-K filing to comply with 404(b) – before full compliance with Section 404(b), which mandates independent auditor attestation of ICFR  

SOX Compliance in SPAC Transactions 

In contrast to traditional IPOs, companies merging with a SPAC face a compressed timeline. The SOX compliance clock starts at the SPAC’s IPO date, not the merger date. This means: 

• There is no new grace period after the business combination. 
• If a SPAC filed its first annual 10-K prior to the merger and the de-SPAC transaction occurs before the second 10-K is due, the surviving target company would be required to be complaint with SOX 404(a) in its first 10-K as a public company. 

If a SPAC IPOs in June 2025 and completes its merger in January 2026, the combined entity must comply with SOX requirements based on the June 2025 timeline. This accelerated schedule requires rapid readiness for filings such as Form 10-K and 10-Q.  

Disclosure Relief After SPAC Transactions 

SPAC deals often make full compliance with 404(a) difficult in the first annual report. Although not always ideal, the SEC guidance allows companies to include explanatory disclosures when the assessment is incomplete. These disclosures typically address: 

• Reason for omission: For example, “Due to the timing of the business combination, management was unable to complete its assessment of ICFR effectiveness.” 
• Impact of the transaction: Explain how the merger affected internal control readiness, such as system integration or resource constraints.
• Scope of work performed: If partial testing or documentation was completed, companies should describe what was done and what remains outstanding. 

This transparency helps investors understand compliance status and mitigates risk perception while signaling a plan for future compliance. 

Key Risks & Challenges for SPAC-Merged Companies 

• Compressed Timeline: Unlike a typical IPO, a SPAC transaction can be much faster, leaving limited time to design, test, and document internal controls. 
• Resource Strain: Building compliant internal control frameworks quickly can stretch internal teams and financial resources. 
• Operational Risk: Poorly designed controls can lead to reporting errors, regulatory scrutiny, or even restatements. 
• Lag in Readiness: If a company delay starting its SOX roadmap, it may fail to meet SOX 404 requirements in a timely manner. 

Best Practices to Ensure SOX Readiness 

To navigate these challenges effectively, companies going public via SPACs should consider: 

• Early planning: Begin risk assessment and mapping out internal controls as soon as the company is exploring routes to going public including potential de-SPAC transactions. 
• Clear role definitions: Assign ownership of controls, responsibilities, and access rights. 
• Automation & Technology: Use systems to automate control logging, testing, and reporting.
• Frequent Testing: Validate the design and effectiveness of controls proactively. 
• Gap Analysis: Identify control weaknesses early, address them and document remediation. 

By following these steps, a company can build a scalable and compliant SOX structure even under compressed SPAC timelines. 

Learn More About Our SOX Compliance Consulting

Why Engaging an Experienced Partner Matters 

Successfully navigating SOX compliance in a SPAC environment requires precision and experience, at BPM we deliver on both. Our team brings deep experience in internal controls, financial reporting, and the unique demands of SPAC transactions, enabling companies to establish strong, scalable frameworks for public-company readiness.  

We offer practical, hands-on support throughout the process, from designing and implementing controls to ensuring thorough documentation and training. With a strategic approach that connects compliance efforts to long-term business objectives, BPM provides the trusted guidance organizations need throughout the de-SPAC transition and beyond.